THE LIBRARY OF IBERIAN RESOURCES ONLINE
GUATEMALA VILLAGES OF THE 16TH CENTURY
Dan Stanislawski
Products
of dramatic commercial value have been studied by many authors and
information regarding them made available; but the ordinary things of
living have not received the same attention. That gap can be partially
filled for mid-sixteenth century Central America by the tribute lists
made under the so-called Cerrato reforms. The record that throws light
on the general condition of such affairs is found in the bundle of
papers listed in the Archive of the Indies as legajo #128. It is a
fairly thorough account of the things that the natives produced and,
because it had become evident by the mid-sixteenth century that most
Spaniards were not going to profit greatly from the "precious" things
in Central America, but could be compensated by payments of the
products of agriculture and native handicrafts, these things make up
the bulk of the items on the lists.
Throughout
central America several items had been considered as fundamental
tributes to be paid by Indians to the native overlords. These were
mostly taken over in the same form by the Spanish conquerors, both to
support their ménages and, if possible, to yield cash, e.g.
cacao,
mantas, or another marketable product (Jose Miranda, 1952, pp. 35, 93;
Chamberlain 1947, p. 642 ). The most important items were maize, beans,
cotton (although in some areas the product was not mentioned, only the
textiles made from it), mantas of woven cotton, chickens, honey,
beeswax, and services. Also, but not as comprehensively paid for
obvious reasons, were salt, fish, reed or rush mats (petates ), chili
peppers, and pottery. In some provinces eggs, sandals, plum wine, and
vinegar were part of the list.
Native Tributes,
Pre-Hispanic
Orellana
refers to the fact that the Quichés, in the earliest period of
their
residence in Guatemala, continued to pay tribute to their ancestral
lords of Tula, in Mexico ('84, p. 63).
Later
documents indicate that Indians paid their native lords common services
such as planting the fields, and personal services in their lords'
dwellings. Also they made material
contributions such as cotton textiles, cacao, and honey (op. cit. pp.
64-66; and see Carmack, '79, pp. 30, 81-82).
But
there were differences. Charles Gibson pointed out that the precious
stones and precious metals, with which both Cortés and Bernal
Díaz
began their lists, received less attention in later reports.
Cervantes de Salazar, about 1550, observed that Motolinía's list no
longer applied with respect to the objects of gold, silver, feathers,
and precious stones (Gibson, p.353).
The
fact may be indicated by the difference in tributes paid to the "Aztec"
empire by Soconusco (Xoconochco) at the time of the Spanish conquest
and those paid in 1549 by its neighboring area (in Guatemala). At the
time of the conquest Soconusco paid its native conquerors a
considerable list of luxury items including ocelot skins, elaborated
drinking cups made of gourds, gold and amber, highly valued jadeite
beads (Chalchihuitles), 8,000 bunches of feathers including quetzal,
green, blue, red, and yellow ones, bird skins as well as cacao (Borah
and Cook, 1963, pp. 142-43). Whereas, in 1549 the neighboring area paid
Guatemala's most important encomendero , Francisco de la Cueva, tribute
of various standard food items, mantas , and a relatively modest amount
of cacao. The only extraordinary items were thirty two bedspreads, and
twenty eight decorative cloths (paramentos).
A half dozen
years after the date of the "Cerrato" tribute list, one of the judges (oidores)
of the high administrative court (the Audiencia ), Alonso de Zorita,
suggested that a fair tribute would be six reales for a married man and
three for widows and single men. (p. 252). Cook and Borah (1971, p.
330) write that by the mid 1570s tributes (in Nueva Galicia) had been
standardized so that virtually all tributaries paid six reales in
silver, plus one hundred pounds of maize, and one chicken per year.
Such standardization was certainly not the case in the tribute reports
regarding the isthmian provinces of Central America in the
mid-sixteenth century.
Another
practice—for
which Spaniards later were criticized—was that of sending people from
one climatic zone to another to work for their masters; but it, too,
was part of native custom (op. cit. p. 78). Lovell ('85, pp. 52-53)
refers to the tribute demanded by the Quiché from other native
peoples
after military conquests. Fowler ('89, pp. 191, 269) relates that the
evidence for the tributary base of the Cuzcatlan state (i.e. the Pipil
state: essentially present El Salvador, west of the Lempa River) is
clear.
To make
sure that the tributes were forthcoming, the native lords appointed
official collectors. The Spaniards found it convenient to continue that
practice with themselves as beneficiaries of most of the same tributes
that had been paid previously (Orellana, '84, pp. 138, 167, 223-24).
But there was a difference: tributes paid by natives to other natives
in pre-Columbian society had been adjusted through the generations so
that a balance had been recognized between the needs of the tributaries
and the surplus that they could pay to their overlords. Spanish
conquerors in many cases superimposed their demands upon those that had
been previously made. Often the result was an unconscionable burden on
the natives.
A report by the
Indian leaders of the town of Atitlan in 1571 stated:
"We submitted to
Pedro de Alvarado.............This pueblo gave men and women—400 to
500--to work as
servants or in mines. Also they paid mantas, cacao, honey, chickens,
salt, chili, copper,
pita, and many other things...............Many were badly
treated-------many died.............until
came Licenciado Zarrato (Cerrato) who moderated the
tributes...............he
cancelled slavery". (Report on Atitlan. RAH Munoz coll. sol. 42, f
115-118).
Regional
variation in Tributes
Differences
in the matter of payments among the provinces were an outcome not only
of variances in the native schedule of tributes which were taken over
by the Spanish, but because of differences among the Spanish
conquerors. Pedrarias and his men in Nicaragua, for example, created a
desolation greater than that in any other province except perhaps Honduras.
Because of that, there was a comparative paucity of tributes paid.
A
quite different attitude from that of the Pedrarians was shown by the
Montejos and the Franciscans in Yucatan. Payments there were simple,
and perhaps in the context, reasonable.
The
organization of San Salvador was an inheritance from the Mexican
traders and settlers who, through many centuries, had brought an
efficient organization to that part of Central America.
Differences between San
Salvador and San Miguel—the area east of the Lempa River—were largely a
result of
physical differences in geology and soils, but especially in climate:
east of the Lempa unpredictable droughts occur. For that reason
agricultural production is at hazard. The region was not considered
desirable by the Mexican immigrants (the so-called Pipiles)
and remained under the control of the less sophisticated Lenca. The
fact that the Lenca used poisoned spears and arrows may have
contributed to their ability to cling to the territory.
Santiago
province was a tangled product of the disparities of choice and control
by the various Mayoid groups who inhabited the highlands and extended
their influence into the lowlands. The fact of the "untimely" death of
Pedro de Alvarado undoubtedly reduced the potential exploitation of
those natives. That sanguine and sanguinary man might well have
established a greatly different—and more extortionate—tribute list from
the one put into effect by the Crown and the Church.
Of
the nine provinces included in the tribute list, little need be said
regarding Tabasco. Of its ten towns, five were under the Crown and two
were under Francisco de Montejo, who received half of the tribute of
another. Of this latter town, two encomenderos shared the half not paid
to Montejo. Two other encomenderos held one town each. For two of the
largest towns, Champoton and Xicalango, the number of tributaries is
not shown. For the other eight towns a total of 1020 tributaries are
listed. Aside from those of the Crown and
Montejo, 325 tributaries were held by four encomenderos, who had plots
of maize planted for them, received some Indian service, fowl (European
or indigenous), chili, beans, a little pottery, and, most important,
180 xiquipiles of cacao.
In
the matter of payments, the two other provinces of Yucatan, Merida and
Campeche, were obviously similar to each other in organization and
quite
different from the other
seven provinces of the tribute list. Beeswax was paid to encomenderos
in greater quantities and chickens in greater numbers than anywhere
else except for San Salvador; but aside from these two items, tributes
were modest and the list is short.
The
two provinces of Nicaragua, Leon and Granada can also be considered
together because the tributes are generally comparable, and they differ
considerably from the others. Leon encomenderos were paid at the
highest rates in maize and beans planted, and those of Granada at a
rate only somewhat less. The crops of those plantings produced a
surplus which could be shipped out to the impoverished Caribbean lands.
Salt was paid at the highest rate. Servants were supplied at as high a
number in comparison with the tributary population as was the case in
any other province.
The
tributes paid in Comayagua, the only part of Honduras listed in the
document, suggest a forlorn place. The history of abuse in Honduras by
slavery for mining gangs and for shipment to the West Indies would make
it surprising if it were otherwise ( See Chamberlain, 1953, pps. 36,
53, 60, 64, 120; also Sherman. 1979, pp. 29, 42, 43). A small
compensation was made to its encomenderos for the meagreness of
resources by the number of servants allotted. Herders were supplied in
sufficient numbers to suggest that livestock may have become a
compensation for deficient agriculture.
San
Miguel, the part of present El Salvador east of the Lempa River, was,
in the light of the tribute payments, a poor relation of San Salvador
(as it certainly is today). Without distinction in anything, it trailed
behind its more prosperous neighbor.
San Salvador stood out as a
peak of efficiency in exploitation of its resources: soils and
Indians. While maize and beans were not planted in the averages per
tributary that they were in Nicaragua, the amounts were high in
comparison with all other provinces, and in the length of the list of
payments received by its encomenderos it was salient. Cotton harvests
must have offered a large surplus for sale as nearly 26,000 lbs. of
seed were planted. At a yield of twelve and one half lbs. of lint per
pound of seed, the harvest would have been 325,000 lbs.; but as
toldillos required about three and a half lbs. each, the total of
15,139 paid to encomenderos would have required about 53,000 lbs.,
leaving more than three times that amount for sale. This was true
despite the fact that payment of woven materials (calculating the toldillo
as being two thirds the value of a manta)
was the highest of the provinces. The payments of chickens was as high
as that of any other province and higher than most; and the payment of
a long list of items: honey, herders, fish, chili, eggs, alpargatas,
cutaras ,
wheat, wine, vinegar, was the highest of the provinces. Perhaps the
Spanish authorities allowed such consideration to the San Salvadorans
partly because Los Izalcos , then a cacao area (now in the southwest of
El Salvador) had been assigned to the encomenderos of Santiago.
In amounts of payments
payments received by its encomenderos, Santiago
was either at the bottom of the list of provinces or near it, except
for three items: cacao, salt, and servants. Only one quarter of the
Santiago towns paid "unusual tributes" whereas two thirds of the towns
of San Salvador did.
was a form of cash so
attractive to the Santiago men that they not only
demanded it as tribute (paid to five sixths of them) but also exchanged
their servants for additional cacao or other forms of cash (silver or
gold coin, or mantas).
In Santiago Province all
encomenderos received cash in some form (coin, mantas or
cacao), mostly
by exchanging servants. Over three quarters of those making exchanges
received coin (silver tostones or gold pesos ).
Others were paid in other forms of cash: ten received mantas , nine
received cacao. Four exchanged grain to be planted for some form of
cash (Goncalo Najara, Ovalle, Paez, and Paredes). Five exchanged one
form of cash for another (Arias, Cristobal
Lobo, Lope Lobo, Lopez de Villanueva, and Mendez de Sotomayor).
Five encomenderos exchanged
servants for grain to be planted (Aragon, Diaz de la Reguera, Francisco
Lopez, Morales, and Cristobal Salvatierra). Lopez de Villanueva
exchanged two servants for 200 feathers.
Encomendero
Exchanges
|
Encomendero
|
Exhanged |
For |
| Aleman | servants | 30 mantas |
| Go de Alvarado | 3 servants | 18 gold pesos |
| Alvarez |
7
servants
2
servants |
20 xiquipiles
of cacao
20 tostones |
| Aragon | 6 servants | 100 lbs.
planted, wheat 100 lbs. " maize |
| Arias | 200 mantas 8 servants
|
50 xiquipiles of cacao 30 gold pesos |
| Bobadilla |
10 servants 10 servants |
150 tostones 150 " |
| Bozarraez | 3 servants | 50 mantas |
| Calderon | 6 servants | 100 tostones |
| Çavallos | 3 servants 3 " |
7 1/2 xiq. of cacao 18 gold pesos |
| Celada | 10 servants | 200 tostones |
| J. Chaves | 15 servants 5 " |
400 tostones 80 " |
| Bernal Diaz | 20
servants (each day of Lent) |
400 " |
| Diego Diaz | 5 servants | 75 " |
| Diaz de la Reguera | 1 servant | 50# maize planted |
| Escobar | 12 servants | 60 gold pesos |
| Figueroa | 6 servants 2 herders |
120 tostones 20 " |
| Gonçalo Najara, Pedro |
4 servants 200 lbs. maize planted |
20 gold pesos 25 " " |
| Gutierrez de Gibaja | 150 mantas 3 servants |
37.5 xiquipiles of
cacao (from Suchitepequez
in cacao country) 30 mantas (from Cuylco, near Chiapas where the mantas were large) |
| Larios | 4 servants 4 " |
60 tostones
80 " (Larios received no other payment from Queçaltepeque, #92) |
| C. Lobo | 400 mantas 2 servants 1 servant and 1 herder |
400 tostones (if
the Indians prefer it). |
| L. Lobo | 150 mantas | 150 "(if the Indians prefer it) |
| Fr'co Lopez | 6 servants 1 servant |
120 mantas 50 lbs. maize planted. |
| Lopez de Villanueva |
50 mantas 2 servants 2 servants 3 servants |
20 xiquipiles of
cacao 40 tostones 200 feathers 7 xiquipiles of cacao |
| Luarca | 10 servants | 150 tostones |
| A. Marroquin | 10 servants | 60 gold pesos |
| B. Marroquin | 6 servants | 100 tostones |
Mendez de Sotomayor |
150 mantas 3 servants |
31 .5 xiquipiles of
cacao 30 mantas (app. large mantas: , they were from the town of Cuilco in the west near the Chiapas border) |
| Monterroso | 12 servants |
200 tostones |
| Morales |
4 servants 3 servants 2 servants 6 servants |
20 gold pesos 7.5 xiquipiles of cacao 20 tostones 200 lbs. planted, maize 20 mantas |
| Ovalle |
300 lbs. planted, wheat 6 servants |
50 mantas from Xacaltenango 80 tostones |
| Ovid |
5 servants |
80 tostones |
| Paez |
300 lbs. planted, wheat 5 servants |
40 mantas (from Aguacatlan) 14 xiquipiles of cacao (from Çacapula) |
| A. Paredes | 4 servants 200 lbs. planted, maize |
20 gold pesos 25 " |
| P. Paredes | 6 servants | 100 tostones |
| L. Perez | 4 servants | 10 xiquipiles of cacao |
| Perez Dardon | 12 servants 20 servants |
40 xiquipiles of
cacao 150 gold pesos |
| Perez Peñate | 2 servants 3 herders |
10 gold pesos 10 " " |
| Pulgar | 2 servants | 10 gold pesos |
| Resino | 3 servants 5 " |
50 tostones 75 " |
| Rodas |
6 servants 3 " |
100 " 40 " |
| Rodriguez Cabrillo |
3 servants |
7 xiquipiles of cacao |
| Salazar |
4 servants |
40 large mantas (from Xutiapa) |
| C. Salvatierra |
5 servants 6 " |
14 xiquipiles of cacao 200 lbs. planted, maize |
| R. Salvatierra |
2 servants |
40 tostones |
| F. Sanchez |
4 servants 1 servant |
20 gold pesos 5 " " |
| Sanchez Santiago |
2 servants 2 " |
30 mantas 30 " |
| Sanchez Tamborino |
4 servants 1 servant |
15 gold pesos 5 " " |
| Utiel |
4 servants |
10 xiquipiles of cacao |
| Velasco |
2 servants 4 " |
40 mantas (from Cuchil, #11, now
part
of Nebaj) 50 " (from Uçumacintlan, #71, now part of S. Pedro Necta) |
|
Modal Exchange Values: |
|
|
|
1 Toston (1/2 silver peso ) |
1 manta |
|
|
|
.067 servant |
|
|
|
.1 67 xiquipil of cacao |
|
|
|
.333 gold peso |
|
|
|
3 lbs+ maize planted |
|
|
|
.10 herder |
|
|
100bs maize planted |
37.5 tostones |
|
|
|
37.5 mantas |
|
|
|
12.5 gold pesos |
|
|
|
9.0 xiquipiles of
cacao |
|
|
|
3. servants |
|
|
1 manta |
1 toston |
|
|
|
.067 servant |
|
|
|
.167 xiquipil of
cacao |
|
|
|
.333 gold peso |
|
|
|
3 lbs. maize planted |
|
.10 herder |
||
| 1 servant/year |
15 tostones |
|
|
15 mantas |
||
|
5 gold pesos |
||
|
2.5 xiquipiles of
cacao |
||
|
3.- lbs. maize planted |
||
|
1.5 herders |
||
|
100 feathers |
||
1 herder |
10 tostones |
|
|
10 mantas |
||
|
3.3 gold pesos |
||
|
1 .67 xiquipiles of
cacao |
||
|
2 lb. maize planted |
||
1 xiquipil of cacao |
6 tostones |
|
|
6 mantas |
||
|
2 gold pesos |
||
|
.13 lb. maize planted |
||
|
.4 servant |
||
1 gold peso |
3 tostones |
|
|
9. lbs. maize
planted |
||
|
3 mantas |
||
|
.5 xiquipiles of cacao |
||
|
.2 servant |
||
Huatli
(Amaranthus particulatus var. leucocarpus Saff.), a grain, was of
almost
equal importance to Chia and maize in tribute payments to the empire of
the Mexican plateau (Borah and Cook, 1963). It was a productive starch
and oil producer that either had not been known in Central America or
was discouraged by the Church because of its importance in the native
religious ceremonies. It was virtually eliminated by the Spanish for
that reason.
Gourds
(from the tree Crescentia cujete that originated in the Old World but
whose gourds apparently were carried by ocean currents to the New World
before the continents were discovered by Europeans). Shells of the
mature fruits were—and are—used for multiple household purposes in
Mexico, but none are listed for the provinces of legajo #128.
Jadeite
from the middle Motagua River valley was of high value in pre-conquest
times and was traded widely (Morley et al '83, p. 213, Rands, 1965, pp.
561-80) yet it is not mentioned in the tribute list.
Squash are not mentioned, yet
at least some of the numbers of varieties mentioned by Fuentes y Guzman
(Vol. V, Bk IX, Cap. 2, p. 228) must have been present in northern
Central America.
The same is true of the varieties of maize and beans. Nor are ropes,
nets, baskets (except
for Chicovites ), or vegetable dyes derived from various
plants.
The Items of Tribute
Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)
This
source of protein fundamental to Middle America was paid to a large
proportion of the encomenderos in eight provinces of legajo #128. But
only about one fifth of the towns paid, and less than half of the
encomenderos received payment.
The
plant has considerable environmental tolerance and range but production
is not satisfactory under conditions of too much moisture because of
leaf diseases, weeds, and insect pests (Hernandez Bravo, 1973, p. 145).
The best conditions are those of relative dryness on well-drained
slopes. MacBryde, referring to Guatemala, reported that the best
elevation zone was that lying between 1500 and 2000 meters (appr. 5,000
to 6500 feet); and trade from that zone to others is common (p. 75 ).
Interplanting
The
almost universal interplanting of maize, beans and squash in Mexico is
not duplicated in Central America. Although in San Miguel, as in the
provinces of Nicaragua (see DS '83, pp. 28-9), the normal procedure was
to plant maize and beans in the same field. Also in those provinces
more than sixty percent of the towns planted twice in one year. In the
province of Santiago most entries of maize and beans are separated in a
fashion that suggests separated plantings. In a few cases (towns #147,
185, 194, 195) it is stated that they were to be planted together; and
in a few other cases, although somewhat ambiguous, the entries may
suggest the same thing. That situation is also true of Comayagua
province.
For San Salvador, the phrasing
and placement on the tribute list seems to indicate that they were
planted separately.
Two
crops in one year was a rarity except for Nicaragua and San Miguel: no
town in Santiago did so; none in Yucatan; only two in San Salvador and
Five in Comayagua.
The following statistics
indicate the disparity of payments among the nine provinces:
|
Province
|
Lbs. planted
|
Presumed Harvest
|
Total tributaries (including estimates)
|
Lbs. paid per tributary (Average) |
||
|
Santiago |
3,500 |
35,000 |
29,290 |
1.19 |
||
|
S. Salv. |
8,500 |
85,000 |
10,468 |
8.12 |
||
|
S. Mig. |
11,100 |
111,000 |
6,020 |
18.44 |
||
|
Comayagua |
4,000 |
40,000 |
3,307 |
12.10 |
||
|
Leon |
11,150 |
111,500 |
5,400 |
20.65 |
||
|
Granada |
10,000 |
100,000 |
6,200 |
16.13 |
||
|
Mérida |
8,632 |
86,320 |
37,000 |
2.33 |
||
|
Campeche |
4,876 |
48,760 |
20,700 |
2.36 |
||
|
Tabasco |
200 |
2,600 |
705 |
2.84 |
||
Nicaragua
(Leon and Granada), San Miguel and Comayagua all received large
payments and virtually all encomenderos were paid. As in the case of
other tributes, the payments from Yucatan were relatively low and
virtually all encomenderos were paid. Santiago's payments were even
lower than those of Yucatan and less than half of the encomenderos
received payment. Expectably, payments of San Salvador were many times
those of Santiago.
Nowhere
in the tribute list is a distinction made as to the particular bean to
be planted, yet Phaseolus vulgaris has produced many varieties, for
many situations and tastes. (See Stanislawski, '83 pp. 28-9).
CACAO
(Theobroma cacao is the most
important species; another species,
Theobroma bicolor, commonly called Patashti—from Nahua—or Patlaxti
produces an inferior product: Dillon, p. 116). In 1579, Estrada y
Niebla (p. 77), referring to the areas of Zapotitlan and
Suchitepéquez
in the province of Santiago, said that "patastle, with a fruit
resembling cacao (is not) traded outside this province and has less
than half the value of cacao".
According to Oviedo (Vol. 2,
p.245), the King's chronicler of the Indies, cacao was the most
valuable of all trees, an opinion that was generally shared; but with
one strident dissonance, from Benzoni,who was in Guatemala in 1553. He
wrote that chocolate was more fit for pigs than for men (p. 121). He
wrote with some reason because the native drink was a bitter beverage
made with water, ground cacao beans, corn meal and chili pepper. Only
later, after omitting the corn meal and chili and adding cinnamon,
vanilla, and sugar, was it made acceptable to Europeans (Bergman, 1957,
p. 43). Continuing Oviedo: "The owners of such trees are seen as being
very rich, i. e. as 'nobles'............the natives hold
them in value as do Christians, gold and cash. From the seeds the
senores or principales make a drink that is highly regarded. Only they
can do so, because ordinary people could not afford to use their money
as a beverage.........Not only do the principales own
cacao trees but they receive seeds in tribute. They smear the paste
made from the seeds on their faces and think it makes a gallant
appearance. Thus they go to market and other ublic places.......every once in
a while taking off a bit to eat. The trees are planted in land judged
to be fertile and near water for irrigation. The plantations are
laid
out
regularly and properly spaced - ten to twelve feet apart - to get the
best results from the soil. They plant other trees—evergreens—(commonly
of the genus Gliricidia: Stone, 1966, p. 218) from which the lower
branches are trimmed so that they grow straight and form a canopy that
completely shades the ground. Christians call them "black mothers"
(Oviedo, Nicaragua, ed. , 1944, Vol. II, Book 8, Ch. XXX, pp. 245-49 ).
Ponce used the more common phrase, "cacao-mothers" (madres de cacao :
Vol I, pp. 295-99).
The
tree thrives only in oppressively warm, moist air, and can not tolerate
more than a slight breeze. Most of them grow within ten degrees of the
equator. Pineda wrote "The trees are very delicate. Put in the sun they
burn and don't give fruit, if there is too much shade the pods rot, if
they are in the wind the pods are lost before they are ripe" (p. 463).
For successful
production no month should have less than fifty nine degrees average
temperature; and with an absolute minimum above fifty degrees (Bergman,
'57, pp. 43-44). Many of the coastal regions of Central America fall
within those limits. On the Caribbean side, where there is no
protracted dry season, and with rainfall averaging 100 to 140 inches,
they thrive. On the Pacific side, with almost a half year of drought,
irrigation is usually necessary. Best growth is on rich, well-drained
soil, preferably of alluvial or volcanic origin. It is the soil, not
the tree that must be shaded, and kept constantly moist, as the
humidity of the earth is more important than the amount of annual
rainfall. They do best in areas of extremely high humidity - 90% or
more.(Dillon.
1975, p. 117), and with an upper limit of 650 meters (2133 feet)
elevation (Orellana, '84, p. 70). For many humans it is an unpleasant
climate; but in spite of its discomforts and threats to health it was,
because of the high value of cacao, the region that constituted the
wealthiest part of Guatemala in the sixteenth century (Thompson '48, p.
7); but Santiago de Guatemala then included the region known as Los
Izalcos that is now in El Salvador.
Of
the various forms of cash, gold pesos and silver tostones may have been
preferred, but the native currency, cacao, was of high value. Other
things and native services were exchanged for it; but cacao was kept,
not exchanged for anything else except as cash was used. Although
mantas were a form of currency, they were, in some cases exchanged for
cacao; but never the other way round.
Its
value lay not only in gustatory delights and value as cash, but also
because "Cacao was, and still is, of ceremonial importance to many Maya
and Mexican groups in Middle America" (Thompson, '56, pp. 102-06;
García de Palacio, pp. 32-33). Also many Indian groups credited
it as
being a remedy for various ailments (op. cit. p. 106); and Oviedo
attested to its curative qualities stating that it was known as
valuable for many indispositions, pains, and wounds. He added that he
knew that to be a fact because of his own experience: while taking
a horseback trip along the Pacific coast of Nicaragua, he had had an
accident that opened a long and deep gash on his foot which was cured
only after weeks of application of a preparation of cacao oil (Book 8,
chap. 30, pp. 73-74 - Nic. ed.)
Ponce ( Vol. 1,
pp. 295-96) described cacao in some detail: the seeds are like almonds
without shells, but less pointed and thicker..........with a color
between red and black...........The trees are like those of oranges,
but with a larger leaf. Because it is delicate,
the tree can not be exposed fully to the sun, nor can it lack water.
The pods holding the seeds grow on the trunk as well as on the
branches. Removed from the pod, the seeds are put in the sun to "cure".
. In Yucatan trees are planted in pits where the soil is moist and they
are shaded; but that is on small scale and yields small amounts of
fruit (Thompson '56, p. 102). A good yield in cacao areas would be more
than 100 pods per tree, each with twenty eight or more seeds. These
cacao seeds serve as small change in all of New Spain, as does copper
in Castille (Ponce 1,293-96, Pineda,1908, pp. 463-64).
The value of a carga,
(fifty lbs.) that contains 24,000 seeds, in Guatemala, is thirty reales
. Carried to New Spain, Puebla, Tlaxcalla and Mexico City, it
would be sold for at least 50 reales. Some
Indians who have held back their crop and sold it at a propitious time,
became rich. Many Spanish traders are very prosperous because of
sending cacao that they buy in the Indian pueblos by packtrain or ship
to Mexico City. In return, they bring clothes and other necessities to
the Indians.
Besides
being used as money, cacao is toasted and eaten, and used to make many
delicious beverages, some drunk cold and others hot. One product is
called chocolate, made of pulverized cacao with honey and hot water
added. As well as this mixture, there are many others: medicinal and
healthy (Ponce, Vol. I, pp. 295-96).
The
seeds are gathered in two harvests: one, in the period February to
April from the limbs; and the other, November to January, from the
trunk (MacBryde, p.34 )
Early History
of Cacao
The tree's origin was
probably in the western Amazon valley, near the Colombia-Ecuador
boundary (Bergman, 1957, p. 43), but there is no evidence that it was
cultivated in South America before the time of the Spanish conquest
(Bergman, '69, pp. 87-88). From there, it was taken north and into
Central America along the Caribbean coast, as were other products and
attitudes from South America. It was there, probably, that it was taken
into domestication.
Its
introduction to the seasonally dry Pacific side could not have been
made before irrigation had been used in its propagation; but that was
possible by the early Christian period of time, as shown at Edsna, a
site about forty kilometers southeast of Campeche City, on the west of
the Yucatan peninsula, where there had been a complex system of canals
and reservoirs. (Coe, '87, The Maya, p. 118). Even earlier, according
to the same author - by 500-450 b.c - the Zapotecs of Oaxaca had
irrigation on artificially terraced hillsides.( but, he adds, the
evidence for irrigation at Teotihuacan is not strong '86, p. 81).
By
the period a.d. 400-600 introduction had been made on the Pacific side,
at Cotzumalhuapa, as indicated by cacao pods being shown in art
(Parsons, 1969: p. 160). Coe suggests that that culture was probably
Pipil ('87, pp. 84-88). At roughly the same period of time cacao pods
appear in the art of Kaminaljuyu in a religious context (Hammond '82,
p. 133., clearly suggesting a long association. The Pipiles may have
been at Kaminaljuyú around a.d. 400 (Weaver, 1972, p. 149).
Sheets
(1984, p. l10) suggests that the Pipiles may have come from the Gulf
coast about a.d. 600. Coe also believes that they may have come from
the Gulf coast of Vera Cruz (Coe, '87, pp. 84-88).
It
must have been before that time that the Chorotega moved from Mexico
into Nicaragua, as at the time of the Spanish conquest, they were not
involved in the cultivation of the tree. Oviedo reported that in
Nicaragua the Nicarao monopolized its cultivation (Chap. IV, p. 362).
That being the case, the Chorotega must have migrated from Mexico prior
to the dates of Cotzumalhuapa; and the Nicarao, presumably, afterward.
Cacao producing
regions of Central America in 1548-51
Bergman's maps—based
largely on the 1548-51 tribute payments— show the various centers of
production for Santiago de Guatemala and San Salvador. Two material
changes were made in the pattern within a generation after 1548-49:
Soconusco, that had been the greatest producer on the Pacific side
prior to the conquest, declined so badly that the governor wrote
(January 19, 1574) that "many Indians had died, and in all of the
province there were not more than 1200" (he does somewhat contradict
himself later). He wanted to import labor. (Fuentes y Guzman, Vol. I,
pp. 423 ff). The other change took place in the area of the so-called
Nonualcos (an area southeast of Lake Ilopango, including Zacatecoluca)
which in 1548 paid no cacao in tribute, but was producing by 1576 a
great abundance ("cacao abundantissimamente": Garcia de Palacio, p.33).
Far
eastern Guatemala was not, in general, an area suitable for the crop,
chiefly because of low rainfall; and because of wind exposure. In the
drainage of the Motagua River, cacao was not shown to have been paid by
either entry of Çacaguastlan, nor that of Çacapa (Zacapa)
on a right
bank tributary of the Motagua, in an open valley not far from the main
stream. But upstream on that tributary, the town of Chiquimula paid 360
xiquipiles (a xiquipil amounts to 8,000 beans with a weight of
about seventeen lbs.) to two encomenderos. Chiquimula
lies in a lowland with ample water for irrigation, and with highlands
close enough to protect the trees against winds that could tear the
pods from the trees. In the early seventeenth century, Vazquez de
Espinosa reported it as being one of the chief producers of cacao
(¶642, ¶668).
Of
the nine provinces detailed in legajo #128, Santiago de Guatemala was
overwhelmingly the greatest producer; and its totals were raised
considerably by the appropriation of Los Izalcos of the southwest of
present El Salvador. Eighty three town entries (out of 169) of the
province showed payments to sixty three encomenderos (out of
eighty two) of 14,355 xiquipiles directly and 282 more in
exchanges: a total of 14,637.
In the province of San
Salvador, thirteen town entries (out of eighty six) showed payments of
735 xiquipiles (including twenty five by exchanges) to eleven
encomenderos (out of forty four). More than one half of the total was
paid to
one encomendero, Antonio
Docampo. (who received 350 directly and exchanged 300 lbs. of wheat to
be planted and four servants for twenty five additional xiquipiles).
In addition, labor was to be supplied to work his cacao grove.
Thirteen of the other
encomenderos to
compensate themselves for the loss of the province of Los Izalcos
appropriated by the Santiago men, were planting their own groves with
labor supplied by the natives (the normal requirement was three days
service four times per year. During which time they were to be supplied
bread, meat and chili in water (chilate).
On the record of San Miguel
province, twelve entries (out of seventy two) showed payments to seven
encomenderos
(out of thirty three) of 720 xiquipiles (also 100 xiquipiles
were paid to the Crown). Two of the men took the lion's share:
Gaspar Aviles de Sotomayor was paid 320 xiquipiles and Juan de
Mendoça was paid 250 xiquipiles as
well as labor in his cacao grove. Two other men: Gregorio Delgado and
Gonçalo Herrera, were paid labor in their cacao groves although
they
received no cacao in tribute.
In Tabasco, the only province
of Yucatan showing cacao in legajo 128, nine (out of ten)
towns paid; five (all) encomenderos received 360 xiquipiles,
of which the conqueror Montejo received half; the Crown received
210: a total of 570 xiquipiles from the province.
For neither Mérida nor
Campeche were any tribute payments recorded.
Nicaragua payments of cacao
were negligible: in the province of Leon, four encomenderos received
less than fifteen xiquipiles (given, on the list, as two and
one half fanegas ); in Granada province, nine encomenderos
received about forty xiquipiles (less than seven
fanegas).
Comayagua, Honduras, paid none.
The great
preponderance of producing areas were at elevations between 200 meters
(656 feet) and 400 meters (1312 feet). Most towns higher than 400
meters that paid cacao either controlled lower territories or traded
other products for it.
The
difficulties caused by trade was told by Garces in 1570 (in Carmack,
'73, p. 380): (To get cacao, the men of) "the mountain pueblos have to
go to lands where they become ill and some die, and others develop
attachments (amancebados) in the cacao pueblos and even marry
a second time even though the first wife is still living."
Cacaostocrats
A
small group of predatory men made enormous profits by their control of
cacao plantations that they had acquired either by reason of being
original conquerors, or—as in most cases—because of their connections
with the political administration. In 1549, twenty encomenderos were
paid more than 200 xiquipiles per
year. More than half of them held their properties because of the
Maldonado administration; a minority had been rewarded for services in
the conquest. (For the Maldonadoans, see MacLeod, p. 117).
The list below
shows the major beneficiaries of cacao profits, the grantor; also
included is the number of mantas paid, which also
represented
cash:
| Encomendero |
Xiq's |
Mantas |
Grantor | ||
|
Arias (son) |
650 |
300 |
Alvarado ? |
||
|
Barahona
(son) |
600 |
0 |
Alvarado |
||
|
Bezerra |
400 |
300 |
Alvarado |
||
|
Calderon |
630 |
200 |
Maldonado |
||
|
Celada |
250 |
55 |
Alvarado ? |
||
|
Cueva 380 |
|
1600 (fine) |
? |
||
|
Diaz de la
Reguera |
342.5 |
0 |
Maldonado? |
||
|
Duran
(daugher) |
280 |
0 |
Alvarado ? |
||
|
Figueroa |
250 |
140 |
Alvarado? |
||
|
Giron * |
1000 |
0 |
Maldonado |
||
|
|
|||||
|
Gutierrez de Gibaja |
250 |
300 |
Maldonado? |
||
|
Juan de Guzman * |
1171.25 |
0 |
Maldonado |
||
|
Martin de Guzman |
510 |
300 |
Maldonado |
||
|
Francisco Lopez |
211.25 |
0 |
Alvarado ? |
||
|
Juan Lopez |
688 |
0 |
Maldonado |
||
|
Mendez de Sotomayor |
250 |
300 |
Maldonado? |
||
|
Ovalle (son) |
400 |
400 |
Maldonado? |
||
|
Reinoso (widower of
Godines) |
210 |
0 |
? |
||
|
Rodriguez Cabrillo |
262 |
180 |
Maldonado? |
||
|
Salazar ** |
320 |
40 large |
Alvarado? |
||
9,067 xiquipiles out
of a total of 14,355, (nearly two thirds of the total) were paid to
these men.
*
The two men who received the largest payments—from Yçalco—were
Francisco Giron and Juan de Guzman. Also, each was paid the services of
fifty men, three times each
year of two days each time, to cultivate his personal cacao plantations.
**
Salazar also received the services of "Indians to clean and cultivate
the cacao plantation". No number of Indians nor other details were
given.
Two other encomenderos of
Santiago, each of whom was paid sixty xiquipiles in tribute,
received Indian labor in personal cacao groves: Garcia Lopez and the
minor sons of Bartolome de Molina.
CHICKENS:
9 provinces
| Provinces |
Chickens paid/yr. | Percentage of encomederos receiving them | Avg,
Payment Per Tributary |
|
Santiago |
8491 |
(87%)
|
.29
|
|
S. Salv. |
7218 |
(100%) |
.73 |
|
S.Miguel |
3316 |
(88%) |
.54 |
|
Comayagua |
2282 |
(96%) |
.65 |
|
Leon |
1068 |
(76%) |
.23 |
|
Granada |
1424 |
(73%) |
.32 |
|
Mérida |
21460 |
(100%) |
.67 |
|
Campeche |
14198 |
(100%) |
.72 |
|
Tabasco |
452 |
(100%) |
.66 |
|
Chickens were paid in tribute
in all nine provinces: to all encomenderos in
Mérida, Campeche, Tabasco, and San Salvador, to virtually all in
San
Miguel and Comayagua; to a high proportion in Santiago, Leon, and
Granada. For some encomenderos, especially those of San
Salvador — there was a marketable surplus (See Stanislawski, '83, pp.
33-34, for discussion.)
The
tribute list specified European fowl ("de Castilla") for the first six
provinces (the negligible exceptions appear to be oversights).
The
three provinces of Yucatan specified that either European or local fowl
could be paid ("de Castilla o de la tierra"), except for two towns in
Tabasco that required European chickens.
In
the other two provinces of Yucatan, Mérida, and Campeche, it
seems that
the authorities intended that tributaries would pay an average of about
three quarters chicken per tributary. The variation from that amount
was slight in all cases.
The averages per tributary
paid in Santiago varied according to the size of the encomienda: those
with less than 100 tributaries were paid at a rate a little higher than
one per tributary. Encomiendas with 300 or more tributaries
were paid at a rate about one quarter of that.
San Salvador, ever consistent,
insisted upon its due: payments showed but little difference, whether
from small or large encomiendas . It appears that the intent
of the authorities with regard to chickens was about the same as that
in Mérida and Campeche.
San Miguel figures show no
relation to size of encomienda . (It may be noted that Aviles
was highly paid).
Comayagua figures are roughly
comparable to those of San Miguel.
CHILIS
(Chili peppers, aji, pimiento
- Capsicum ssp. the most common being Capsicum annuum)
With certain beans, and
squash, chilis were among the first plants cultivated in the
New World.(Barbara Pickersgill, pp. 443-449 in Ucko and Dimbleby, The
Domestication and exploitation of plants and animals, Chicago -
Aldine - 1969).
In
Mexico, this product was part of the dietary of pre-agricultural
Indians by about nine thousand years ago; and by 3400 b.c., at the
latest, it was among the cultivated plants (Mangelsdorf, MacNeish,
Willey. pp. 487-515 in Struever, 1971, p.514); According to Cobo (1653,
- B. Cobo, Historia del Nuevo Mundo.
Reprinted in 1956 in
Biblioteca de Autories Españoles, 91 .Madrid.) "pepper holds
first
place, after maize, as the plant most common and of greatest esteem
amongst the Indians". (Pickersgill, p.448)
It
is a widely used condiment, a hot weather vegetable, that can be grown
anywhere in the tropics or sub-tropics at any time of year except in
high mountain regions and, because of certain viruses and bacteria, it
has difficulties in lower, damp regions (Martin, Santiago, and Cook,
1979, pp 1, 2, 6, 10).
Entries
in the tribute list, for Santiago are nearly all for towns at
relatively high, and dry localities. Only four towns, out of thirty
four were at low elevations, and their payments were small; small
enough, in fact, for the product to have been acquired easily by trade.
In total, payments of 25,450 lbs. were made to more than one third of
the encomenderos and to the Crown.
In San Salvador, the eager
acquisitiveness of the encomenderos established payments of
13,500 lbs. paid by thirty four towns to thirty encomenderos. The
two towns called Purulapa in the tribute list (present Perulapan and
Perulapilla) and the nearby town of Cuxutepeque (Cojutepeque) paid
relatively large amounts.
In the province of San Miguel,
the total payment was 1050 lbs., made by seven towns to five
encomenderos.
In the province of Comayagua,
six towns paid 500 lbs. to six encomenderos, and one town,
with no encomendero paid another 100 lbs.
In Tabasco province, five
towns paid 750 lbs.
Curiously,
none of this condiment, was specified to be paid in the provinces of
Leon, Granada, Merida, and Campeche. Yet Oviedo remarked that both
"sweet and hot" peppers received great care in Pacific Nicaragua and
Panama (cited by Stone '66, p. 219 ).
COTTON
(Gossypium hirsutum)
For the Indians it had been
used both for making clothes and (as woven quadrangles of cloth) as a
medium of exchange.
In Yucatan (Mérida,
Campeche, and Tabasco) cotton planting was not specified on the tribute
list, although mantas were a fundamental payment; and in
Santiago there was probably not sufficient planted to produce the lint
necessary for the mantas to
be paid. In the provinces of San Miguel, and Comayagua, local planting
was probably sufficient to meet the respective requirements.
A very different situation
obtained in San Salvador, where cotton planting was stipulated by all
but one of the encomenderos; and in Nicaragua, by virtually
all encomenderos in the two provinces. From the amounts
specified in San Salvador and Nicaragua, encomenderos had a
surplus: an additional source of revenue from cotton lint to be
exported.
EGGS
From the evidence of
the tribute list, the taste for eggs was Mexican; and apparently not
Mayan. The great bulk of payments was made in San Salvador; and almost
all of the seventeen towns under Santiago that paid them bore names
with the Nahua syllables tan, tlan, peque, apa, or tenango, almost
certainly towns under Mexican influence, although they were, mostly, in
the interior of the country. Aside from payments in San Salvador and
Santiago, only one other town in the nine provinces—in Comayagua—paid
them.
Evidence of the Mexican taste
is made clear in Leon-Portilla (pp. 33, 39 and others).
They were paid by 42 out of 86
towns of the province of San Salvador to 32 out of 44 encomenderos.
The total payment to encomenderos of 4203 dozens per year
is an average payment of about one half dozen per tributary per year.
No
payment was made to the Crown. Perhaps eggs did not constitute a good
market item that could be converted into cash for payment to the Crown;
but they certainly were a good item for local exchange: note the
payment to Docampo whose menage could hardly have consumed 520 dozen.
Seven encomenderos each
received one dozen per week . Twenty four received from one and one
half to six dozen; and one (Docampo) received ten dozen. Extremes of
payment to encomenderos
|
Enc'rotri'es |
Doz./year |
Doz./year |
||
| |
|
|
||
|
Cepeda/480 |
156 |
.33 |
||
|
P. Ceron/240 208 |
208 |
.87 |
||
|
Coronado/170 |
156 |
.92 |
||
|
Davila/205 |
52 |
.25 |
||
|
M. Diaz/200 |
52 |
.26 |
||
|
Docampo/932 520 |
520 |
.56 |
||
|
L. Hernandez/50 |
52 |
.96 |
||
| Leon/220 |
52 |
.24 |
||
| Melara/90 |
104 |
1.16 |
||
| Pardo/320 |
104 |
.33 |
||
| Perea/60 |
52 |
.87 |
As a tribute
fish were of minor importance in the province, although twenty four
encomenderos
(and perhaps one more, from a town— Malacatepeque—for which no encomendero
was shown) received 3,312 lbs. from twenty six towns. If the twenty
four encomenderos consumed
their fish, they would have had two and one half pounds per week for
themselves and their families; but nothing extra for Lent; and fifty
eight encomenderos' families would have had none.
The
largest payment—650 lbs.—was made to the conqueror, Antonio de
Salamanca. Another large payment—of 500 lbs.—was made to Hernan Perez
Peñate. Seventeen of the encomenderos received less than
100
lbs. per year.
Expectably, one
of the large payments—416 lbs—was made to Martin
de Guzman. The payment was made by the town of Atiquipaque which was
divided between Guzman, credited with one half, and Juan López
who held
the other half; but Guzman's half paid him 416 lbs. and that of
López
paid him 56 lbs. However, balance may have have been established:
López
also received a payment of 160 xiquipiles of cacao while that
of Guzman was 110.
All identified towns paying
fish were lowland: presumably fish taken from the sea; and all
encomenderos
receiving
large payments of fish also were paid either cacao or salt (most of
them were paid both). But there was also stream fishing. Michel
Bertrand (in Carmack, Early and Lutz, '82, p. 174) determined
that "one of the dietary staples of the people of the Chixoy valley had
been river fish" (before their transfer from the valley to Rabinal.
Pineda,
after mid-fifteenth century, referring to Lake Atitlan, wrote that the
natives took fish from it (p. 438); but in the tribute list neither the
towns of Lake Atitlan nor Lake Amatitlan are listed as paying fish.
This
example of an unmentioned item that was obviously important to life in
the province, is one of many. Of course they could be obtained in the
markets; but one wonders if the encomenderos grasp did not
reach beyond the limits set by the Crown.
Fish from San Salvador Towns
Not
unexpectably, this province was distinguished by the amounts paid. (Two
towns: Citala, #83, and Tecoyluca, #1, paid more in total than did all
of the towns of Santiago province).
Some encomenderos required
fresh fish each week. The basic measure was the arrelde of
four lbs; and payments were in multiples of fifty two. Other
encomenderos
required dry fish: figures for payments to them end in 0 or 5
(calculated by arrobas of twenty five lbs., or by cargas of
fifty lbs. (One exception is the encomienda of Pedro Ceron:
his share of the town of Xalocinagua, #7, paid him 1-1/2 arreldes per
week, i.e. 312 lbs. per year ; and Metapa, #46 paid him 1 arrelde per
week, i.e. 208 lbs. per year. The total of fresh fish came to 520.
Another unusual figure was the payment by Tequepa, #35, to Castellon: 1
arrelde per week was paid, as well as an additional payment of
forty eight lbs. of fresh fish during Lent).
Two towns in northern
Chalatenango province, specified panes: Texutla, town
#65, defined the pan as being twenty five lbs.; the other
town, Citala, #83, defined it as thirty seven and a half lbs).
Eleven towns paid both fresh
and dried fish.
The most common payment in the
province was of one arrelde (four pounds) per week. There is
no apparent relation to the number of tributaries.
Town
#24, Gualçapa, was to furnish two fishers each Friday, and
during Lent.
The specification of fishers rather than an amount of fish was the only
one outside of the Nicaraguan provinces where it was standard.
The discrete use of the terms
is shown in the tributes specified for Nonualco, town #25: payments
were to be made of four cargas (200 lbs.) of dried fish per
year, and one arrelde (four pounds) per week of fresh fish.
Olomina (Fundulus
guatemalensis, Order of Cyprinodontformes, which includes
guppies and carp ) is a small lake fish that was particularly prized --
as it still is in Salvadoran markets. In 1548, eight encomenderos of
San Salvador were paid 3636 pounds by ten towns, all near Lake Ilopango
(Fowler, '89, p. 122), of which 2600 pounds were dried. The most
important encomendero of the province, Antonio Docampo
received 450 pounds of dried and 624 pounds of fresh, twenty nine
percent of the grand total.
This
fish was mentioned only once for another province in the legajo: from
the town of Cingualtique in San Miguel province, under the prehensile
encomendero,
Gaspar Aviles de Sotomayor.
Although no reference is made
to olomina in the province of Santiago, Pineda, shortly
after the mid-sixteenth century recorded that the Indians living near
Lake Atitlan caught it (but no payment of it is recorded on the tribute
list).
In the province of San
Salvador, forty (out of forty-four, i.e. 91%) of the encomenderos were
paid 18,618 lbs of fish. If they and their families consumed the total,
they would have had nearly nine pounds per week for the households; but
with no allowance for Lent. 1,900 lbs. were paid to the Crown.
San Miguel
Twenty eight towns paid a
total of 10,491 lbs. to twenty three encomenderos and the
Crown. Ten encomenderos (out
of thirty three) were paid none; six were paid less than 200 lbs. each.
At the other extreme was the grasping Gaspar Aviles de Sotomayor, who
received 2,000 lbs. from one of his six towns, #62, Taminalco; and 300
lbs. of the highly valued olomina from
Cingualtique, #70, the only such payment in the province. Most of his
other tributes were large. Las Casas called him "a very powerful
robber" (quoted by Sherman, p. 169). Another, a seemingly less
"powerful robber", Pedro Serrano, received 1458 lbs. from his one town,
#61, Mercotiquen (unidentified now).
About
half of the towns paying fish were inland and, it can be assumed, that
their tributaries were stream fishers. The other half were probably
near enough to the ocean for sea fishing, especially Taminalco (which
Browning identifies with modern Intipucá, near the south coast),
and
Mercotiquen. The fishermen there probably used the newly introduced
Spanish nets (Foster, George M., Culture
and Conquest, 1960, p.
77)
Two towns (#11, and #12) each
furnished the services of two fishermen on Fridays (días de
pescado),
a form of tribute apparently learned from the Nicaraguans.
If the families of the
encomenderos
consumed
all of their fish, they would have had eight and one half lbs. per week
each from the listed tributes, with nothing extra for Lent.
Comayagua
The
tributaries of this interior Honduran province paid 6,592 lbs. in
total: 5,976 lbs. to ten of the twenty four encomenderos. In addition,
416 lbs. were paid by towns whose encomenderos were not
listed;
and 200 lbs. went to the Crown. One man, Alonso de Caceres, received
1776 lbs; another, Juan de Cabrera, received 872 lbs., eight others
received 416 lbs. each. These fish may have been taken from streams;
but some, and especially
those
paid
to Caceres and to Cabrera could indicate that Indians were sent to the
coast: they may indicate seine-fishing.
As
examples of payments, the tributaries of town #19, Agalteca, under
Caceres, were instructed to pay four lbs. each Friday and each Saturday
and each day of Lent ("...........los viernes y sabados y dias de
Cuaresma cada dla un arrelde de pescado......."). Calculating
Lent as being approximately six weeks long, there would be forty
six other weeks of payment. Town #22, Gualala, under Cabrera, was given
the same instructions, but for one half the amount. Towns #4 and #37
were to pay four lbs. Fridays and Saturday of each week, but there was
no reference to Lent.
If the families
of the twenty two encomenderos consumed their fish, it would
have been more than nine pounds per week for each family. None allowed
for Lent.
Yucatan
Mérida:
Eighteen towns paid fourteen encomenderos 2,075 lbs., of which
750 lbs. were paid to Francisco de Montejo, the conqueror. None was
paid to the Crown. All towns were instructed to pay in arrobas (twenty
five lbs. each).
Campeche: Five
towns paid four encomenderos 415 lbs. Two towns paid the Crown
4,500 lbs.
For all towns arrobas
were specified; one, #2, Campeche, under the Crown described it as
"dried".
As in both
provinces the amounts were given in arrobas and one
specifically states "dried", perhaps all tributes were of dried fish.
Tabasco:
No fish were
included.
Of
the nine provinces the payments may have been sufficient (except for
Lent) in San Salvador, San Miguel, Comayagua, Granada, and Leon; but
the deficiencies of Santiago, Mérida, Tabasco, and Campeche were
large.
In the lack of organization of
those days, not long after the conquest, when the demands of the
encomenderos
perhaps
had more importance than the strictures of the Church, the meatless
days may not have been observed; on the other hand, in those days of
relatively few cattle, most days may have been meatless.
Nicaragua
With one exception (Encomendero
Cepeda,
in San Salvador province who was supplied two on Fridays and during
Lent) the provinces of Leon and Granada were the only ones to give
services of fishermen instead of stated amounts of fish. Thirty seven
fishermen filled the needs of the Granada encomenderos, and
fifty those of Leon (Stanislawski. '83, Tables 2 and 4).
GOLD
In
the thirteen cases in which the exchange of servants for gold was made,
none states whether it was "fine gold" or "base gold" (tipuzque )
which would have had a value of one third less.
HENEQUEN/MAGUEY
In
the province of Santiago it had little importance: three towns—
probably all in the dry western highlands—paid 900 lbs. to two encomenderos
and the King.
In the province of San
Salvador, one town, #19, Guemoco, paid its encomendero , Antonio
de Figueroa, 250 lbs. (For its importance as cordage in Nicaragua, see
Stanislawski, '83, pp. 39-41).
It is not mentioned for other
provinces.
HERDERS
If
numbers of herders are indicative, European domestic animals were only
beginning to have importance in Central America by the mid-sixteenth
century. Caretakers for both ganado (which could mean cattle: ganado
mayor but in most cases probably meant sheep: ganado menor.
Pigs
were mentioned in regard to six of the provinces: most in San Salvador,
fewer in Santiago, San Miguel, and Comayagua; and in small numbers in
the two Nicaraguan provinces. In Yucatan, Spaniards just having
completed the conquest, may not have had the opportunity to introduce
them: at least, they are not recorded.
The
fact that shepherds are not specifically mentioned for any of the
provinces makes one wonder about unrecorded operations. The famous
Mesta (the Spanish politically important sheep-owners guild)
was introduced into the New World in 1529 and given the same broad
privileges that it had been given in Spain (Vicens Vives. 1959, p.
393). Certainly sheep were in Santiago province, and in greater numbers
than might be suggested by the tribute list. In 1546, Alonso Garcia
wrote to the King claiming that the president of the Audiencia, Alonso
de Maldonado, had joined with one Juan de Leon, a prosperous man who
had been a sheep owner for ten or twelve years. Maldonado sent 2,000 to
3,000 sheep to join those of Leon in the municipalities of Totonicapan
and Quezaltenango in the province of Santiago. To exploit their flocks
they formed a company; and, according to Alonso Garcia, Maldonado and
Leon charged the expense of herding to the royal treasury (Garcia, pp.
375-76). Garcia's description of Juan de Leon as a man of wealth does
not fit with the judgement that one might make on the basis of his
encomienda
which listed only one small town with perhaps 15 tributaries, that
paid him twenty-five xiquipiles of cacao and nothing more: no
herders were listed although his prosperity came, apparently, from
sheep.
Santiago
Eighty seven herders were
stipulated to be supplied to twenty four encomenderos; but
unlike house servants which were mostly exchanged for cash, almost all
of the herders were retained. Only one encomendero (Perez
Peñate), who was allotted three, exchanged them all. Two other
encomenderos
(Cristobal Lobo, and Santos de Figueroa) exchanged three that were
allotted them, but in each case kept others.
Of the towns that
supplied herders, fourteen were in the upland interior of the country,
ranging from about 4,000 feet elevation, to about 8,000 feet; nine were
at lower elevations in the dry southeast. Only three were on the
Pacific slope: one, the estancia of Amatitán (#20)
probably referred to an upslope extension of the encomienda . The
same is probably true of two others: #54, Ciquinala (present
Siquinalá), and #107, Ystalavaca and Çamavaque (present
San Pablo
Jocopilas and Samayac).
Francisco de la Cueva, who,
with the largest encomienda in
Santiago province, held an enormous territory in the southwest of the
country. One might expect that that nobleman from the west of Spain
might have introduced sheep, or perhaps cattle onto his property, but
although he received the services of fourteen herders, they were
specified to be pig guards.
More than half of the herders
were specified to be for ganado; and
almost as many were to guard pigs, presumably the lively,
slender-legged, pigs that can now be seen in southwest Spain and in the
Alentejo of southern Portugal. One encomendero specified a
goatherd, but that one was exchanged for cash. In a few cases it was
stated that the herders were to be boys.
San Salvador
In this matter, as in so many
other aspects of economic life, the Salvadoran encomenderos neglected
no opportunity. More the eighty percent of them (thirty six) were
supplied with 132 herders; but it is possible that more—perhaps
all—used such services: for four towns the specification was made that
house servants could be used as herders. As all towns supplied
servants, all towns may have contributed herding services.
The service was for ganado;
for only three towns were pigs mentioned. Six towns listed boys as
herders.
A visitor in 1576 wrote "in
all this coast, there is much grazing land..........in some of which
are cattle ranches.............(but) much more could be had here" (
cited by Browning, p. 46).
San Miguel
Fourteen towns out of seventy
two furnished thirty-one herders to thirteen encomenderos (out
of thirty-three). About half were specified as ganado guards,
and half as pig guards.
The situation may have changed
before 1586 when Ponce went through the region. He reported that "after
passing the Lempa River...........there was abundant cacao, cotton, and
along the Pacific coast region many estancias of cattle (ganado
mayor). (Ponce, Vol. 1, pp. 329-30).
Comayagua
Fourteen towns out of thirty
entries furnished twenty-one ganado herders to eleven
encomenderos
(out of twenty-three); no pigs were mentioned.
Leon
One encomendero required
two boys to herd ganado and work in the house. It is the only
suggestion of herding.
Granada
One encomendero required
four herders for ganado.
In
the above two provinces of present Nicaragua, the large amount of
grazing land, later so important, was then—at least on the
record—little used. Yucatan (Merida, Campeche, and Tabasco)
Herders are not mentioned.
HONEY, WAX, AND BEES
From
the accounts of bees and beekeeping it is clear that there were genera
and species of the Meliponidae family that thrived in the lowlands and
others in the highlands. Although trade may confuse origins, the
number
of towns in both upland and lowland that paid tribute of honey suggests
a wide distribution of the product.
Landa, shortly after
the conquest of Yucatan, wrote that there were two types of bees—both
small and stingless—producing small "blisters" like nuts
of wax, all
close together and filled with honey. Abundant, they appeared mostly in
the concavities of trees (p. 235). The area of Chetumal, on the east
coast of the peninsula of Yucatan, in pre-conquest times, had thousands
of hives of the native stingless bees, and Cozumel was a noted center
of apiculture (Hammond, 1982, p. 230).
Las
Casas, referring to Nicaragua, wrote that the Spaniards sent the
Indians to the mountains to procure wax and honey (Breve Relacion, p.
66).
Vazquez de
Espinosa (1942, par. 706) in the early seventeenth century, wrote that
in the area of Tegucigalpa, Honduras,"in the woods they collect much
wax and honey from the bee-trees".
Olaverreta,
alcalde mayor of Huehuetenango (1902 meters—6239 feet elevation) in
1740, referred to the fact that several upland Guatemala Indian towns
kept beehives (1935, pp. 16-24).
Nordenskiöld
cites evidence regarding Indians of San Salvador that kept two species
of bees, one as large as a house fly and the other the size of a
mosquito. Both were domesticated and housed in hives consisting of
small gourd shells, hung up on the walls of the huts (1930, p. 202).
Wagner
describes the beekeeping of the Nicoya lowland s (Wagner, 1958, p. 232;
presently Nicoya is part of Coasta Rica, but in the colonial period, it
was an appendage of Nicaragua). According to Wagner "one of the most
characteristic features of the rural household.............is the bee
log which hangs under the eaves of the dwelling. The native stingless
bees that are kept around houses belong to several genera of the
Meliponinae" (sic). Eight kinds are distinguished in Nicoya". each
produces a distinct honey.
He
describes the acquisition of the swarms: "Wild honey is gathered in the
woods in April and May. At the same time, swarms are captured simply by
cutting the logs and branches in which the bees are found. The log is
left lying on the ground in the woods for three days to
accustom the hive to a horizontal position, then is carried to the
house in the cool of the evening to avoid exposure to great heat or
excessive light. It is hung with lianas or leather thongs under the
roof where it will be shaded.......Almost every house in the country
hamlets and many of the dwellings in the towns have such bee logs"
(Wagner, 1958, p. 232).
In the matter of honey, the
tribute list of Santiago is at least consistent in being disordered.
Payments were specified by cantaros in some cases, in others,
by arrobas , in still others, by jarros or
jarrillos, or botijas . However
the weights were given in a sufficient number of cases so that the
totals can be calculated. For three towns it was stated that a cantaro
of honey was to contain one half arroba , five towns
specified that a cantaro was to contain two açumbres
. Five other towns specified jarros of two açumbres
each. From such specifications one can assume that cantaro and
jarro indicated the same weight, i.e. twelve and one half
pounds, as didjarrillos, and botijas . Frequently the
statement is made "of the kind usually given".
In both the provinces of San
Salvador and San Miguel, the requirements were stated in terms similar
to those of Santiago, but more clearly. Honey was specified in
cantaros
or arrobas, and beeswax in arrobas.
In Comayagua, the
specifications were for arrobas, cantaros, or botijas, all
equal in weight, which meant that the latter two, specified to be of
one arroba each, were twice the weight of cantaros or
botijas in the other provinces mentioned.
Payments in the provinces of
Granada and Leon in Nicaragua were specified in cantaros for
honey and arrobas for wax; but the weight of the cantaro was
never given. Honey and wax were paid by about half of the towns in
Granada; only ten percent of the towns in Leon paid either product.
Virtually
all towns in the provinces of Mérida, Campeche, San Salvador,
San
Miguel, and Comayagua paid honey; one half or less of the towns of
Granada and Santiago paid it. Only about ten percent of the towns of
Leon did and only one town of Tabasco.
A summation of
payments of honey to encomenderos and the Crown in the nine
provinces (ranked by amounts paid) follows:
|
Granada |
7,750 lbs. |
||
|
Merida |
4,962.5 " |
||
|
San
Salvador |
4,687.5 " |
||
|
Leon |
4,637.5 " |
||
|
|
3,750 lbs
to the Crown from Nicoya; 887.5 lbs to encomenderos |
||
|
Santiago |
4,000 lbs. |
||
|
Campeche |
2,471.5 " |
||
|
Comayagua |
1,325 " |
||
|
San Miguel |
1,062.5 " |
||
|
Tabasco |
50. " |
||
BEESWAX
The
product was apparently not useful to the natives in pre-Columbian time.
Benzoni, in the mid-sixteenth century wrote "that although the Indians
have much wax they don't use it for anything. They make light with pine
branches" (1965, p. 122). Nordenskiold reported that in the various
parts of the Americas that he had seen, they took no interest in it
except as an article to trade to whites (1930, pp. 198-99). But after
the advent of the Church in the New World it became important.
Mérida
The
Yucatan peninsula was a region of sophisticated apiculture. Taking
control of the production and trade in honey and wax, the Spanish
encomenderos
(all but two) were paid at the average rate of 1.2 lbs. per
tributary
(all but three towns made payment). A few encomenderos received
somewhat less than one pound per tributary; but they were more than
counterbalanced by such encomenderos as the Adelantado Montejo
who received an average payment of 1.41 lbs. from his 4,490 tributaries.
Campeche
All encomenderos there
received payment of wax. The rate paid was somewhat less than that of
Mérida: one pound per tributary was intended and most payments
were
either that or nearly so. Glaring exceptions were those of Juan de
Rutia (Urrutia? See Roys, pp. 109-10). who received 1,400 lbs. from 960
tributaries (a rate of 1.46 lbs. per tributary); and those of Marcos de
Ayala, who received 1100 lbs. from 730 tributaries: that rate of
payment was 1.51 lbs. per tributary.
Santiago
This product was obviously of
little interest to the encomenderos of the province: ten
towns, some in the northwest highlands, and some in the dry, southeast
paid 787.5 lbs. to ten encomenderos and the Crown.
San
Salvador
True to form, no opportunities
were overlooked in this province: only one encomendero failed
to receive wax (80% of the towns paid). The average payment was .74
lbs. per tributary, but eighteen towns paid at a rate of more than one
pound per tributary.
San
Miguel
Forty percent of the towns of
this province paid wax to one third of the encomenderos. The
average payment was about one third pound per tributary. No town paid
as much as one pound per tributary; and some, much less.
Leon
Only six encomenderos were
paid a total of 250 lbs. However, the town of Nicoya—presently in Costa
Rica—was listed under the city of Leon. Its 600 tributaries paid 900
lbs. to the Crown (Stanislawski, '83 - table 1; and Andagoya - p.406 -
referred to the very many stingless bees near the Gulf of Nicoya).
Granada
The encomenderos of
Nicaragua's other province, Granada, received high payments of wax. Two
thirds of the encomenderos receiving
wax, were paid at a rate of more than one pound per tributary. The
average payment from the towns paying wax was 1.22 lbs. per tributary.
Presumably the Granadans met their own needs and those of the province
of Leon.
Comayagua
One town (with no n