[541] The permanent tribunals of the Spanish Inquisition were Toledo, Seville, Valladolid, Corte (Madrid), Granada, Córdova, Murcia, Llerena, Cuenca, Santiago (Galicia), Logroño and Canaries, under the crown of Castile, and Saragossa, Valencia, Barcelona and Majorca under the crown of Aragón. In addition were Sicily, Sardinia, Mexico, Lima and Cartagena de las Indias, which lie beyond the scope of the present work.
This distribution of the forces of the Inquisition was not reached until
experience had shown the most effective centres of action. Numerous more
or less temporary tribunals were erected and many changes occurred in the
apportionment of territory. The following list makes no pretension to absolute
completeness but contains the result of such allusions as I have met in
the documents.
ALCARAZ. For some years there was a tribunal fixed at Alcaraz. In 1495
Alonso Hernández, presented for a canonry, is qualified as Inquisitor
of Alcaraz and, in 1499, Alonso de Torres is appointed as inquisitor there.
(1)
ARMY AND NAVY. The fleet organized for the Catholic League which won
at Lepanto seemed to require a tribunal to preserve it from heresy and
Philip II procured from Pius V a brief of July 23, 1571, authorizing the
inquisitor-general to appoint an inquisitor for each army of Philip II,
whether by land or sea. (2) The first appointment
under this seems to have been Rodrigo de Mendoza, Inquisitor of Barcelona,
whose commission as Inquisidor de las Galeras is dated March 21,
1575, [542] together with one for his notary, Domingo de León,
and instructions as to his duties. (3) He
was succeeded by Gerónimo Manrique, who celebrated an auto de fe
in Messina. After him was Doctor Juan Bautista de Cardona, but merely as
commissioner, who served for two years, when Páramo, writing in
1598; tells us that the fleets were scattered and the office ceased to
exist. (4) If so, it was revived for, in
1622, we are told that Fray Martin de Vivanco, chaplain of the galleys
of Sicily, was appointed Inquisidor del Mar and, in 1632, it is
stated that when a Principe del Mar was appointed he took with him
an inquisitor and officials and all prisoners arrested by them were delivered
to the nearest tribunal when the galleys made port.
(5)
In later times the inquisitor-general was "Vicario general de los Reales
Ejércitos de Mar y Tierra" and as such appointed sub-delegates to
accompany the army, with the necessary powers. The jurisdicción
castrense enjoyed by military men did not exempt them in matters of
faith from the Inquisition, but the subdelegados castrenses seem
to have possessed no judicial powers, and debate arose, in 1793 and again
in 1806, whether they or the episcopal Ordinaries should be called in to
vote with the inquisitors in the cases of soldiers.
(6)
AVILA. When Torquemada built his convent of San Tomas in Avila he provided
accommodations for an Inquisition and, in 1590, the prisoners accused of
the murder of the Santo Niño de la Guardia were transferred thither
from the tribunal of Segovia for trial. It continued to exist for some
years and had connection with Segovia, for, June 9, 1499, Francisco González
of Fresneda and Juan de Monasterio were appointed inquisitors of Avila
and Segovia, residing sometimes in one city and sometimes in the other.
(7)
BALAGUER. There were autos de fe celebrated in Balaguer, August 15,
1490 and June 10, 1493, but these were held by the inquisitors of Barcelona
as they did in Tarragona, Gerona, Perpignan and other places in their district.
In 1517, however, there would seem to be a tribunal there for a letter
of the Suprema relates to the murder of the assessor of the Inquisition
of Balaguer. If so, it was probably withdrawn in consequence for, in 1518,
the inquisitors of Barcelona are [543] ordered to publish edicts
against those who molest the clergy of Balaguer for observing the interdict
cast upon the town. (8)
BARBASTRO. As early as 1488 there was a tribunal with inquisitors at
Barbastro, but, in 1521, it was suppressed and incorporated with Saragossa.
(9)
BARCELONA. Established in 1486. It claimed jurisdiction over the free
Republic of Andorra, which was included by Arevalo de Zuazo in his visitation
of 1595. Long after Roussillon and Cerdagne had been retroceded to France,
the Barcelona inquisitors in 1695 still styled themselves "Inquisidores
Apostólicos . . . en el Principado de Cataluña y su partido,
con los Condados de Rosellon y Cer-daña y los Valls de Aran y Andorra."
(10) See LÉRIDA, TARRAGONA, TORTOSA, BALAGUER.
BURGOS. There was originally a tribunal in Burgos but, in the redistricting
by Ximenes it was included in Valladolid. In 1605, Philip III transferred
the tribunal to Burgos, with orders to the inquisitors to eject any occupants
of buildings that they might find suited to their purposes. In 1622 it
was still rendering yearly reports of cases to the Suprema but, probably
about 1630, it returned to Valladolid. When, in 1706, Madrid was captured
by the Allies under Galloway and Las Minas, the court fled to Burgos, carrying
the Inquisition thither, but its stay was short and it soon returned to
the capital. (11)
CADIZ. See XERES.
CALAHORRA. A tribunal was established here as early as 1493, when it celebrated an auto at Logroño. In 1499 it alternated between Calahorra and Durango. In the redistricting by Ximenes in 1509 it was incorporated with Durango, but was soon re-established. Cédulas of 1516, 1517, and 1520 indicate that at this time it was the tribunal of the enormous district of Valladolid, but in 1522 the Inquisition of Navarre was extended over Calahorra; then Navarre and Calahorra were separated, but in 1540 there was a redistribution, and Navarre and the Basque Provinces were added to Calahorra. In 1560 a part [544] of the territory of Burgos was set off from Valladolid and added to Calahorra and, in 1570, the seat of the tribunal was definitely moved to Logroño, q. v. (12)
CALATAYUD. Calatayud was the seat of an intermittent tribunal at least
from the year 1488 for, in 1502, Ferdinand speaks of Joan de Aguaviva who
for fourteen years had served it as barber-surgeon whenever it resided
in Calatayud and one of the first presentations to a prebend, in 1488,
was Martin Márquez, described as fiscal of the Inquisition of Calatayud.
A letter of the Suprema, Jan. 22, 1519, addressed to the "Inquisitor of
Calatayud" shows that it was still in existence, but it must soon afterwards
have been merged into Saragossa. (13)
CANARIES. The zeal of Diego de Muros, Bishop of Canaries, did not wait
for the extension of the Spanish Inquisition over his diocese, but led
him to establish an episcopal one by proclamation of April 28, 1499. It
was not until 1504 that Inquisitor-general Deza sent Bartolomé López
de Tribaldos thither to establish a tribunal at Las Palmas, which seems
to have commenced business Oct. 28, 1505. It continued thus to the end.
(14)
CARTAGENA. See MURCIA.
CIUDAD REAL. A letter of Ferdinand, Nov. 8, 1483, announces the appointment
of Licenciados Costana and de Balthasar as inquisitors for Ciudad Real.
May 10, 1485, Ferdinand announces the transfer of Costana to Toledo, to
which place the tribunal was removed. (15)
CORDOVA. A tribunal was established in Córdova as early as 1482,
at the instance of its bishop, the New Christian Alonso de Burgos. Its
district comprised the bishoprics of Córdova and Jaén, the
Abadía de Alcalá la Real, the Adelantamiento of Cazorla,
with Ecija and Estepa, to which Granada was added after the conquest.
(16) See GRANADA and JAEN.
[545] CORTE. The tribunal of Madrid was technically known as Corte. Madrid, originally a town of no special importance, belonged to the province of Toledo and was naturally under the jurisdiction of its tribunal. As the royal residence under Philip II and eventually the capital of the kingdom (except during the brief transfer to Valladolid, 1600-1606) it furnished a large part of the business of Toledo. Toledan inquisitors came there to make investigations and even to try cases, of which we have examples in 1590 and 1592. (17) Something more than this was felt to be needed and the Suprema adopted the plan of calling inquisitors from other places to commence prosecutions and act under its instructions, of which the Licenciado Flores, Inquisitor of Murcia, in 1593, and Cifontes de Loarte, Inquisitor of Granada, in 1615, are examples. (18) The presence of the inquisitor-general who did not hesitate to take action in emergencies, and that of an experienced commissioner, together with the frequent sojourn of one of the Toledo inquisitors enabled speedy action to be taken when requisite, as occurred in 1621 and again in 1624 and seemed to render superfluous the organization of a special tribunal. (19)
Yet the want of it was felt, especially with the influx of Portuguese
New Christians who multiplied in the capital. As the pressure increased
Toledo furnished two assistant inquisitors to reside in Madrid, thus establishing
a kind of subordinate court, but in 1637 it was reported that the establishment
of a tribunal was positively resolved upon, with the added comment that
this would sorely vex the Toledans. (20) To
their natural opposition is doubtless to be attributed the postponement
of what, to a Spaniard of the period, would seem a necessity to the capital.
It cannot have been long after this that one was organized for, in the
matter of the confiscation of Juan Cote, commenced in Toledo, we find it,
September 10, 1640, sitting in Madrid, with Francisco Salgado and Juan
Adam de la Parra as inquisitors. In the same year they suggested that the
case of Benito de Valdepeñas, on which they were engaged, should
be sent to Toledo as more convenient for the witnesses, which was accordingly
done. (21) Toledan influence is doubtless
responsible for the action of Arce y Reynoso, soon after his accession
in 1643, in suppressing the new tribunal and restoring the business to
[546] Toledo. (22) The pressure,
however, became too great and Arce y Reynoso was obliged to reverse his
action. The date of the re-establishment may safely be assumed as 1650,
for a list of penitents, reconciled by Corte from the beginning, starts
with three in 1651 and their trials can scarce have been commenced later
than 1650. (23) Yet the relations between
Toledo and Madrid continued intimate; in 1657, Lorenzo de Sotomayor styles
himself as "Inquisidor Apostólico de la Inquisicion de la Ciudad
y Reyno de Toledo y asistente de Corte;" to the end of the century the
former always alluded to Corte as a despacho or office and not as
a tribunal, and Corte seems to have sent its convicts to Toledo for their
sentences to be published in the autos de fe. (24)
Its jurisdiction was strictly limited to the city, while the
surrounding country remained with Toledo. In some respects its organization
was peculiar. About 1750 we are informed that its inquisitors were drawn
from other tribunals who continued them on their pay-rolls, their places
being taken by appointees who served without salary until a vacancy occurred.
Selection to serve in Corte was regarded as a promotion, leading to a place
in the Suprema or to a bishopric, although the incumbent drew only the
salary from his former tribunal with a Christmas propina of a hundred
ducats. It had no receiver; the Suprema paid its expenses and presumably
collected its fines and confiscations. (25)
CUENCA. Murcia and Cuenca were originally under one tribunal. Some
trouble apparently arose, possibly connected with the episcopal Ordinaries,
for Ximenes ordered, January 22, 1512, that cases originating in Murcia
should be taken to Cuenca to be voted on and vice versa. Llorente says
that in 1513 they were separated and Cuenca formed an independent tribunal,
but documents as late as 1519 show them still connected, until, in 1520,
we find Cuenca celebrating an auto. A letter of March 7,1522, states that
the pope has given to Cuenca the see of Sigüenza, without taking it
from Toledo, because Toledo has never visited it although ordered to do
so, and is not to do so in future. Then, May 31, 1533, the Suprema says
that Toledo can exercise jurisdiction there without giving Cuenca cause
of complaint, and, in 1560, Sigüenza was restored to Toledo, yet in
1584 we find Cuenca exercising jurisdiction as far north as Soria. There
would seem to have been some connection maintained between Murcia and Cuenca
for, in 1746, [547] the former, in enumerating its personnel, specifies
nine calificadores in Murcia and four in Cuenca.
(26)
DAROCA. There would appear to have been for a time a tribunal in Daroca
for, in the accounts of Juan Royz, receiver of Aragón, for 1498
there is an item of expenditure on the prison of the Inquisition there,
which was duly passed. (27)
DURANGO. See CALAHORRA. As defined by Ximenes, in 1509, Durango had
jurisdiction over Biscay, Guipúzcoa, Alava and Calahorra, with some
neighboring districts. (28)
ESTELLA. See NAVARRE.
GALICIA, also known as SANTIAGO. The earliest allusion to this tribunal occurs in a commission issued at Coruña, May 20, 1520, to Doctor Gonzalo Maldonado as Inquisitor of Santiago. It was probably some time before the tribunal was in working order but in 1527 it had caused sufficient alarm for the Suprema to write to João III of Portugal asking for the arrest arid surrender of those who had fled from it and, in the same year, a warrant for three hundred ducats was drawn to be distributed among the inquisitors and officials of the Inquisition of Galicia. This was followed by a similar payment in 1528, showing that the tribunal was not self-sustaining. (29) Apparently the harvest was scanty and the tribunal was allowed to lapse, until the scare about Protestantism called attention to the ports of the North-west as affording ingress to heretics and their books, for we hear nothing more about it until 1562, when Philip II, in letters of June 2nd and 26th informs the governor and officials of Galicia that Valdés had despatched Dr. Quixano there as inquisitor; they are no longer to prosecute cases of heresy as they have been doing but are to lend him all aid and favor and are to allow him to dispose as he pleases of the seats in his public functions, without disputes as to precedence. In 1566 we hear of Bartolomé de León as receiver there, which would indicate that it was at work and was making collections. (30) Still, it had a struggle for existence, for it was discontinued early in 1568, but it was re-established [548] within a few years, if Llorente is correct in saying that its first auto de fe was celebrated in 1573. A letter of Dr. Alva, its inquisitor, October 31, 1577, speaks of having, in the previous year, sentenced Guillaume le Meunier, he being the only inquisitor, with the advice of a single consultor, showing that the tribunal was sparingly equipped. (31) In later years it became one of the active tribunals of the kingdom. Its district comprised Coruña, Pontevedro, Orense and Lugo.
GRANADA. Granada, after its capture, was included in the inquisitorial
district of Córdova until, in 1526, the tribunal of Jaen was transferred
thither. (32)
GUADALUPE. A temporary tribunal was organized here in 1485 which during
its brief existence was exceedingly efficient (see p. 171).
HUESCA. See LÉRIDA.
JACA. A tribunal apparently existed here, which was annexed to Saragossa in 1521. (33)
JAEN. A tribunal must have been established here about 1483, for two of its inquisitors took part in the assembly of Seville which framed the Instructions of 1484. It seems to have been discontinued, for September 2, 1501, Ferdinand ordered a certain Doña Beatriz of Jaen to abandon her house to the inquisitors sent thither, and to seek other quarters until they should finish the business that took them there. This indicates that only a temporary tribunal was intended but the situation was conveniently central and it was one of those retained by Ximenes in his reorganization of 1509, when he assigned to it the districts of Jaen and Guadix, with Alcaraz, Cazorla and Beas. It was still in existence in 1525, as shown by a royal letter of that date, but in 1526 it was suppressed and united with Córdova, the tribunal being transferred to Granada. In 1547, the official title of the tribunal was Córdoba y Jaen. Rodrigo tells us that it was re-established independently in 1545, but this is evidently an error and the name does not reappear in subsequent lists of tribunals. (34)
LEON. In 1501 we hear of "inquisitors of the province of Leon," whose district cannot have been confined to that province, for Ferdinand, [549] writing September 2nd to "Cousin Duke" tells him that they have occasion to go to his city of Coria (Extremadura) and asks that they may occupy his house while there. In 1514, also there is allusion to the receiver and alguazil of the Inquisition of Leon. (35) Apparently the term is a synonym of the tribunal of Valladolid.
LÉRIDA. The provinces of Huesca in Aragón and Lérida and Urgel in Catalonia were united as an inquisitorial district at least as early as 1490, when we hear of "the inquisitors of Huesca and Lérida" taking testimony. In 1498, a letter of Ferdinand, October 8th, announces the transfer of Urgel to Barcelona. Allusions to the tribunal continue to occur in the correspondence of Ferdinand, who, in 1502, called away the inquisitor, as there was so little to do; Saragossa would attend to heresy and only the financial officials need be left. It was not discontinued however. In 1514, there was an attempt to murder the inquisitor, Canon Antist, but in 1519 he is still addressed as inquisitor of Lérida. In this same year, however, Charles V, in a letter of January 22nd, speaks of the tribunals of Huesca, Tarazona and Lérida having been united with that of Saragossa, and, when the people of Huesca complained, in the Cortes of Saragossa, of their citizens being carried away for trial, he ordered, under pain of a thousand florins, that no one should interfere with the jurisdiction of the Saragossa tribunal. October 9th an inspector reported that there was no need of a receiver or other officials there, whereupon they were all dismissed. In 1532, however, the inquisitors of Saragossa undertook to appoint a receiver for Lérida, but were told by the Suprema to cancel it as this was a function of the crown. (36)
LOGROÑO. In 1570, as we have seen, the tribunal of Calahorra was shifted to Logroño, which, in 1690, defines its territory as the whole kingdom of Navarre, the bishopric of Calahorra and la Calzada, Biscay, Guipúzcoa, Burgos along the mountains of Oca and the sea-coast as far as San Vicente de la Barquera, thus comprising the modern provinces of Navarre, Guipúzcoa, Biscay, Santander, Alava, Logroño and a large part of Burgos. (37)
LLERENA. Originally Extremadura and Leon were combined. In 1500, Enrique Paez is receiver for the sees of Plasencia, Coria and Badajoz and the Province of León. In 1509 Ximenes assigned to [550] Llerena as its district, Plasencia, Coria, Badajoz and the lands of the military Orders, but as late as 1516 it is spoken of as the Inquisition of Leon, Plasencia, Coria and Badajoz. Its original seat was Llerena but, in 1516, it was transferred to Plasencia and the receiver was ordered to sell the houses purchased at Llerena for the prison because others will be wanted for the purpose at Plasencia. It was migratory, however and, in 1520, the people of Ciudad Rodrigo, Coria and Herida were notified that it was about to leave Plasencia and wherever it went accommodations must be provided for lodgement, audience chamber and prisons. Finally it settled permanently at Llerena and, towards the close of the sixteenth century, Zapata speaks of it as the first tribunal of the kingdom, with the widest jurisdiction. (38)
MADRID. See CORTE.
MEDINA DEL CAMPO. The great importance of Medina del Campo as a centre
of trade rendered inevitable its selection as the seat of a tribunal at
an early period. In 1486 it was fully furnished with three inquisitors
and an assessor, the Abbot of Medina serving as Ordinary. In 1516 we find
it incorporated with Valladolid. When the court moved to Valladolid, the
buildings of the Inquisition were wanted for its accommodation and the
tribunal, in June 1601, was unceremoniously sent to Medina, where Dr. Martin
de Bustos was turned out of his house to lodge it. Its stay was short,
for in 1605, as we have seen, it was transferred to Burgos and there is
no later trace of a tribunal at Medina. (39)
MURCIA, also known as CARTAGENA. See also CUENCA. Murcia was a seat
of one of the early tribunals, comprising the sees of Murcia and Cartagena.
Cuenca, which was attached to it in the redistribution by Ximenes in 1509,
was separated about 1520. Oran, some time after its conquest by Ximenes,
was placed under the jurisdiction of Murcia. The see of Orihuela, although
belonging to Valencia, on its suppression about 1510, was united to that
of Cartagena and thus fell under the tribunal of Murcia, where it remained
after the restoration to episcopal honors in 1564.
(40) The tribunal of Orihuela naturally followed the same course
on its suppression.
[551] NAVARRE. After the conquest of Navarre, in 1512, a tribunal
was established in Pampeluna, where it did not long remain. Then, for a
short period it was transferred to Estella. In 1515 we find it in Tudela,
where Ferdinand orders the Archdeacon of Almazan to visit it as it is in
much need of reform and, soon afterwards, he asks for a delegation of episcopal
power, as Tudela was only a deanery. It was quartered in the convent of
San Francisco, to relieve which, in 1518, the Suprema ordered appropriate
buildings to be obtained. In 1521 and 1522 there was talk of removing it
to Pampeluna; then it was extended over Calahorra; soon afterwards they
were separated but finally, in 1540, they were united and so remained.
Soon after the transfer to Logroño we find the tribunal describing
itself as "en todo el Reyno de Navarra, Obispado de Calahorra y la Calzada
y su distrito." (41)
NAVY. See ARMY.
ORAN. Páramo tells us that when Ximenes conquered Oran he commissioned
Fray Yedra as inquisitor there. Llorente places this in 1516 and calls
the inquisitor Martin de Baydacar, Ximenes's provisor. At that time, however,
there could have been no tribunal there for, July 9, 1516 the Governor
Lope Hurtado de Mendoza was ordered to discover and punish those who were
impeding the sale of property for the Inquisition, work which would have
been entrusted to the tribunal had there been one. By this time it had
probably been suppressed and placed under Murcia.
(42)
ORIHUELA. According to Llorente, Ferdinand, Aug. 7,1507, united the
tribunal of the bishopric of Orihuela to Valencia, which would infer its
previous existence. It was reorganized in 1515, when Bishop Mercader appointed
Pedro de los Rios as inquisitor and he was sent there with a staff of officials,
and the magistrates were ordered to provide quarters for "el tiempo que
fuere menester." This indicates that the tribunal was not expected to be
permanent and it was probably not long afterwards that it was united with
Murcia, q. v. (43)
OSUNA. In 1488, among the presentations to prebends is one of Pedro
Sánchez, qualified as Inquisitor of Osuna.
(44) Such tribunal can [552] only have been short-lived
and must speedily have been incorporated with that of Seville.
PAMPELUNA. See NAVARRE.
PERPIGNAN. August 9, 1495 an auto de fe was celebrated in Perpignan,
but it was held by the inquisitors of Barcelona. In 1518 there was only
a commissioner there but, in 1524, there was a tribunal, with Juan Navardu
as inquisitor and Antonio Saliteda as secretary. It was not permanent however.
In 1566, when de Soto Salazar was sent on his visitation to Barcelona he
was instructed to ascertain and report promptly details for the benefit
of the inquisitor about to be sent to Perpignan to reside for the future
and what officials should be provided for him. It is doubtful whether this
intention was carried out; in any event it was but transitory.
(45)
PLASENCIA. See LLERENA.
SANTIAGO. See GALICIA.
SARAGOSSA. Established in 1484, the tribunal gradually absorbed all
the minor tribunals, but parted with Teruel to Valencia. See BABBASTRO,
CALATAYUD, DAROCA, JACA, LÉRIDA, TARAZONA, TERUEL.
SEGOVIA. Segovia claimed the honor of being among the earliest cities,
after Seville, to possess a tribunal, but there was no representative from
there among the inquisitors assembled to frame the Instructions of 1484,
owing doubtless to the resistance of the bishop Juan Arias Dávila.
(46) One must have been established soon afterwards for, in 1490,
the prisoners accused of the murder of the Santo Niño de la Guardia
were on trial there when Torquemada transferred them to Avila. (See AVILA.)
In the redistribution by Ximenes, in 1509, Segovia was incorporated with
Valladolid, but, in 1544 and again in 1599, the inquisitors of Toledo include
it in their enumeration of their jurisdictions. (47)
SIGÜENZA. A tribunal was early established in Sigüenza which
must have been busy if we may believe the statement that at an auto de
fe in 1494 it relaxed a hundred and forty-nine victims to the secular arm.
[553] In 1506, Deza dismissed the officials for the reason that
it was about to be united with Toledo, a merger ratified by Ximines in
1509. Toledo neglected it and it was transferred to Cuenca, q. v.
In the eighteenth century there would appear to be some kind of subordinate
tribunal there, for about 1750, Saragossa, in a report of its personnel,
states that one of its five inquisitors is assisting at Siguenza.
(48)
TARAZONA. A tribunal established here in the early period was merged into that of Saragossa in 1519. (49)
TARRAGONA. When, in 1643, the inquisitors of Barcelona were ejected,
they were, after some delay, sent to open their tribunal at Tarragona,
where they remained until the suppression of the Catalan rebellion in 1652.
(50)
TERUEL. In 1485 a tribunal was established in Teruel after some resistance.
At what time it was transferred to Valencia does not appear, but a cédula
of October 2, 1502 is addressed to the inquisitors of Valencia residing
in Teruel and Albarracin, showing that it was then subordinate to Valencia.
In 1518 it was discontinued and the district was subjected to the direct
jurisdiction of the Valencian tribunal, but Cardinal Adrian, by a provision
of Nov. 21st of the same year, transferred it to Saragossa and then, March
3,1519 restored it to Valencia. This was felt by Aragón as a grievance
and, at the Cortes of Monzón, in 1533 it asked that Teruel and Albarracin
should be restored to the Saragossa tribunal, but the request was peremptorily
refused and they remained subject to Valencia. (51)
TOLEDO. In 1485 the tribunal of Ciudad Real was transferred to Toledo.
At first the limits of its district seem not to be clearly defined for,
in 1489 the Inquisitors were told to go to Guadalajara and Ferdinand ordered
the local authorities to show them favor and allow them to make arrests.
See CORTE, CUENCA, SEGOVIA, SIGÜENZA, VALLADOLID for sundry changes
in its district. In 1565 the official designation is the city and archbishopric
of Toledo, the city and bishopric of [554] Sigüenza and the
bishoprics of Avila and Segovia, which apparently remained permanent, except
the detachment of Madrid. (52)
TORTOSA. For some reason the bishopric of Tortosa, although part of
Catalonia, was subject to the tribunal of Valencia. When, in 1697, Vendôme
captured Barcelona, the tribunal emigrated to Tortosa and established itself
in the Colegio Imperial. Although peace was declared soon afterwards it
remained in Tortosa at least until 1700 and presumably stayed until the
conclusion of the War of Succession, when it was reinstated in Barcelona
in 1715. (53)
TUDELA. See NAVARRE.
VALENCIA. The old Inquisition of Valencia was reorganized in 1484, and continued to the end. As seen above, it parted with Orihuela to Murcia, obtaining Teruel and Albarracin from Saragossa and Tortosa from Barcelona.
VALLADOLID. A tribunal was assigned to Valladolid in 1485, but did not
get into working order until 1488. After this it was suspended to be revived
in 1499, as appears from a letter of Isabella, Dec. 24, 1498. The northern
provinces of Spain were comparatively free from heresy and Ximenes, in
his reorganization of 1509, assigned to Valladolid the enormous district
comprising the sees of Burgos, Osma, Falencia, Segovia, Avila, Salamanca,
Zamora, Leon, Oviedo and Astorga and the abbeys of Valladolid, Medina del
Campo and Sahagun. In 1516 the enumeration is the same except the omission
of Zamora and the addition of Ciudad Rodrigo and Calahorra. Roughly speaking,
it may be assumed to comprise the whole of the provinces of Old Castile,
Leon and Asturias. Valdés, August 8, 1560, repeated April 12, 1562
made over the whole of this to Toledo, but the grant can only have been
temporary for, in 1565 the Toledan inquisitors described themselves as
of the city and archbishoprics of Toledo, the city and bishopric of Sigüenza,
with the bishoprics of Avila arid Segovia, and in 1579 we find the inquisitors
of Valladolid styling themselves inquisitors of the kingdoms of Castile
and León and the principality of Asturias. This enormous district
it continued to retain, subject to the easternmost portion detached to
Calahorra or Logroño and to its translation in 1601 [555]
to Medina del Campo and thence to Burgos, from which it returned to Valladolid,
probably about 1630. (54)
XERES. In 1495, Rodrigo Lucero is described as Inquisitor of Xeros
In 1499 the sovereigns appointed Alonso de Guevara Inquisitor of Cadiz
and Xeres. The tribunal continued there for some time In 1515 Ferdinand
alludes to Luis de Riba Martin "our late receiver in the Inqusition of
Xeres," Who in dying had left to the treasury a legacy of 30,000 mrs. for
the relief of his conscience. (55) I have
met no later reference to it and probably it was soon afterwards merged
into the tribunal of Seville.
1. Bibl. nacional, MSS., Tj, 28.--Llorente, Añales, I, 252.
2. Archivo de Alcalá, Hacienda, Leg. 1049.
3. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 940, fol. 58.
5. Franchina, Breve Rapporto della Inquisizione di Sicilia, p. 98.--Juan Gómez de Mora, Relación del Auto de Fe celebrado en Madrid, este año de 1632 (Madrid, 1632).
6. Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 4, n. 3, fol 70; Leg. 17, n. 3, fol. 5.
7. Boletín, XV, 333-45; XXIII, 415-16.--Llorente, Añales, I, 253.
8. Carbonell de Gestis Haereticor. (Coll. de Doc. de la C. de Aragón, XXVIII, 137, 139).--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 72, P. I, fol. 61; P. II, fol. 72, 110.
9. Bibl. nacionale de France, fonds español, 80, fol. 44.--Llorente, Añales II, 242.
10. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Visitas de Barcelona, Leg. 15, fol. 4.-- Proceso contra Estevan Ramoneda, fol. 72 (MSS. of Am. Philos. Society).
11. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. I; Leg. 1465, fol. 32; Lib. 56, fol. 605, Llorente, Añales, II, 5.
12. Llorente, Añales, I, 213, 252; II, 3.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 4, fol. 1, 7, 104, 159, 162; Lib. 5, fol. 24; Lib. 73, fol. 211; Lib. 76, fol. 51, 53; Lib. 78, fol. 216, 258; Lib. 79, fol. 17, 226; Lib. 80, fol. 1.
13. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 2, fol. 8; Lib. 74, fol. 120.--Informe de Quesada (Bibl. nacional, MSS., Tj, 28).
14. W. de Gray Birch, Catalogue of MSS. of the Inquisition in the Canary Islands, I, xvi, 5, 6 (London, 1903).
15. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisition, Lib. 939, fol. 62.
16. Matute y Luquin, Autos de Fe de Córdova, pp. 1, 75.
17. MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. III.--Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 113, n. 6.
18. MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, p. 206.--MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, T. VII.
19. MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. VI, X.
20. Rodríguez de Villa, La Corte y Monarquía de España, p. 47.--Cartas de Jesuitas (Mem. hist, español, XIV, 6).
21. MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. IX, VI
22. Bibl. nacional, MSS., D, 118, fol. 146, n. 49.
23. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1024, fol. 28.
24. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 1474, fol. 67.--Archivo hist, nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 1.
25. Archivo de Alcalá, Estado, Leg. 2843.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 1474, fol. 15.
26. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 84, 440, 445, 454; Lib. 4, fol. 9; Lib. 933; Lib. 939, fol. 63, 139; Lib. 9, fol. 29; Leg. 1157, fol. 144; Inquisicion de Corte, Leg. 359, fol. 3.--Llorente, Añales, II, 3.
27. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.
29. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 940, fol. 38, 39, 53; Lib. 76, fol. 74.
30. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 930, fol. 127; Lib. 926, fol. 141; Lib. 940, fol. 101.--Cf. Novís. Recop. Lib. u, Tít. vii, ley 1, nota 9.
31. Scháfer, Beitráge, II, 76, 77.--Llorente, Hist. crít. Cap. XLVI, Art. i, n. 11.
32. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 80.
33. Llorente, Añales, II, 242.
34. Arguello, fol. 1.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. I; Lib. 929, fol. 297; Sala 40, Lib. 4, fol, 164.--Llorente, Añales, II, 2.--Rodrigo, Hist, verdadera, II, 261.--Juan Gómez de Mora, Relación del Auto de la Fe de 1632.
35. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1; Lib. 3, fol. 381.
36. Bibl. nationale de France, fonds espagnol, 80, fol. 24, 26.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1; Lib. 72, P. i, fol. 2, 177, 198; Lib. 9, fol. 24, 68; Lib. 77, fol. 53.
37. Archivo de Alcalá, Hacienda, Leg. 498.
38. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1; Lib. 3, fol. 447; Lib. 5, fol. 9, 27. --Llorente, Añales, II, 3.--Miscelanea de Zapata (Mem. hist, español, XI, 59).
39. Archivo de Simancas, Patronato Real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 28.-- Archivo gen. de la C. de Aragón, Regist. 3684, fol. 94.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 4, fol. 1; Legajo 1465, fol. 31, 32.--Cabrera, Relaciones, p. 107.
40. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 4, fol. 95, 96; Lib. 3, fol. 453.-- Archivo hist, nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 61.--Gams, Series Episco-porum, p. 55.
41. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 316, 366; Lib. 72, P. i, fol. 116; Lib. 73, fol. 142, 247, 248.--Archivo hist, nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 498.
42. Páramo, p. 159.--Llorente, Añales, II, 91.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 453.
43. Llorente, Añales, II, 5.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 332, 333.
44. Informe de Quesada (Bibl. nacional, MSS., Tj, 28).
45. Carbonell de Gestis Haeret. (op. cit. XXVIII, 83).--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 72, P. n, fol. 57, 59; Lib. 930, fol. 40; Lib. 13, fol. 372.
46. Bergenroth, Calendar of Spanish State Papers, I, xlv (London, 1862).
47. Colmenares, Historia de Segovia, Cap. xxxiv, § 18.--Padre Fidel Fita (Boletin, XXIII, 415).--Llorente, Añales, II, 3.--Proceso contra Mari Naranja; Proceso contra Catalina Machado (MSS. penes me).
48. Llorente, Añales, I, 217, 317, II, 3.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion de Corte, Leg. 359, fol. 1.
49. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 9, fol. 24; Lib. 926, fol. 141.
50. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 65, fol. 31, 50; Lib. 36, fol. 74.-- Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 9, n. 2, fol. 323.
51. Archivo gen. de la C. de Aragón, Regist. 3684.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 2, fol. 16; Lib. 72, P. II, fol. 40, 169; Lib. 74, fol. 133; Inquisicion de Barcelona, Cortes, Leg. 17, fol. 47, 48.
52. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 62.--MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. VIII.
53. Proceso contra Ignacia ----; contra Estevanillo F. (MSS. of Am. Philos. Society).--Archivo hist, nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Seccion Varios, Leg. 13.--Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Sala 39, Leg. 4, fol. 23.
54. Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1; Lib. 4, fol. 1; Lib. 929 fol 63-MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, T. VIII.-Llorente, Añales II, 3.- Bibl. nationale de France, fonds espagnol, 354, fol. 242.
55. Informe de Quesada (Bibl. nacional, MSS., Tj., 28) .-Llorente, Añales I, 252. -- Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 3, fol. 423.